49 Unique Guild Members 14 Level 100 characters 401 Website/Forum Members 0 Posts in 24 hours 0 Posts in 7 days 84313 Total Posts Nelthilta is the last poster
49 Unique Guild Members 14 Level 100 characters 401 Website/Forum Members 0 Posts in 24 hours 0 Posts in 7 days 84313 Total Posts Nelthilta is the last poster
Druids / Warriors - LOL. Payback for S3/S4 I'm guessing.
Keep in mind these are statistics based on a realm full of a good PvPers with equal gear with equal opportunity to choose any class or spec they would like to compete with. IMO these are some of the most unbiased numbers you'll find for deciding what classes/specs are over/underpowered.
Druids / Warriors - LOL. Payback for S3/S4 I'm guessing.
Keep in mind these are statistics based on a realm full of a good PvPers with equal gear with equal opportunity to choose any class or spec they would like to compete with. IMO these are some of the most unbiased numbers you'll find for deciding what classes/specs are over/underpowered.
Paladins aren't OP. They're idiot idea that high burst damage is a good idea makes them and shamans the only viable healers because of their abilities to deal with it well. Besides, paladins were ALSO under represented from s2+ so, lol payback.
I don't think a realm full of the best PvPers makes for unbiased statistics. Hell, simply stating that it's full of the best PvPers leads it to be biased, having a select population.
Interesting how often this page updates, now it shows mages, warriors, and druids at 2%.
I don't think a realm full of the best PvPers makes for unbiased statistics. Hell, simply stating that it's full of the best PvPers leads it to be biased, having a select population.
Interesting how often this page updates, now it shows mages, warriors, and druids at 2%.
Oh God. Inc stupid conversation about a proper sample size.
Dudebro was probably the closest to posting an accurate sample size of top 100 comps ect. Count the number of Paladins there and I bet you its higher than whats posted here.
Oh God. Inc stupid conversation about a proper sample size.
Dudebro was probably the closest to posting an accurate sample size of top 100 comps ect. Count the number of Paladins there and I bet you its higher than whats posted here.
You could be right about top comps, but obviously because that was our server and it relates most to us if we want to extrapolate information about our battlegroup. I tend to think that in this case, the largest sample size is the proper sample size. % of specs and classes works better because it does not discriminate between comps IMO. This thread was made as a jest to show the state of classes overall, and I stated to 'buff rogues and mages' knowing that they are already quite well off.
Oh God. Inc stupid conversation about a proper sample size.
Dudebro was probably the closest to posting an accurate sample size of top 100 comps ect. Count the number of Paladins there and I bet you its higher than whats posted here.
You could be right about top comps, but obviously because that was our server and it relates most to us if we want to extrapolate information about our battlegroup. I tend to think that in this case, the largest sample size is the proper sample size. % of specs and classes works better because it does not discriminate between comps IMO. This thread was made as a jest to show the state of classes overall, and I stated to 'buff rogues and mages' knowing that they are already quite well off.
Get flawless then make posts directed towards me, k?
I don't think a realm full of the best PvPers makes for unbiased statistics. Hell, simply stating that it's full of the best PvPers leads it to be biased, having a select population.
Interesting how often this page updates, now it shows mages, warriors, and druids at 2%.
Why?
Take a team of the best players and allow them to choose any class they want, all given equal gear. See what they can do well with.
It's not warriors or druids, and this definitely is in line with the general belief of their overall power in arena at the moment.
It's by far less biased than any normal realm/battlegroup/SK gaming list because those "percentages" of representation don't factor in population differences of each class. Mages could be the best class in the world in Arena but there may only be 2% of players overall that even play a mage, making the statistics completely skewed.
The tournament realm stats make the most sense, and just looking at them IMO is perfectly accurate. Paladins are the best healers in arena, everyone knows it.
Hunters are BS, everyone knows it.
Rogue/Lock/DK/Sham/Mage are all decent and can play in a decent number of comps. Priests aren't the best healers, and everyone knows druids/warriors are gimp right now, especially druid healers. I have a feeling almost every druid on there is a feral.
I don't think a realm full of the best PvPers makes for unbiased statistics. Hell, simply stating that it's full of the best PvPers leads it to be biased, having a select population.
Interesting how often this page updates, now it shows mages, warriors, and druids at 2%.
Why?
Take a team of the best players and allow them to choose any class they want, all given equal gear. See what they can do well with.
It's not warriors or druids, and this definitely is in line with the general belief of their overall power in arena at the moment.
It's by far less biased than any normal realm/battlegroup/SK gaming list because those "percentages" of representation don't factor in population differences of each class. Mages could be the best class in the world in Arena but there may only be 2% of players overall that even play a mage, making the statistics completely skewed.
The tournament realm stats make the most sense, and just looking at them IMO is perfectly accurate. Paladins are the best healers in arena, everyone knows it.
Hunters are BS, everyone knows it.
Rogue/Lock/DK/Sham/Mage are all decent and can play in a decent number of comps. Priests aren't the best healers, and everyone knows druids/warriors are gimp right now, especially druid healers. I have a feeling almost every druid on there is a feral.
I don't think a realm full of the best PvPers makes for unbiased statistics. Hell, simply stating that it's full of the best PvPers leads it to be biased, having a select population.
Interesting how often this page updates, now it shows mages, warriors, and druids at 2%.
Why?
Take a team of the best players and allow them to choose any class they want, all given equal gear. See what they can do well with.
It's not warriors or druids, and this definitely is in line with the general belief of their overall power in arena at the moment.
It's by far less biased than any normal realm/battlegroup/SK gaming list because those "percentages" of representation don't factor in population differences of each class. Mages could be the best class in the world in Arena but there may only be 2% of players overall that even play a mage, making the statistics completely skewed.
The tournament realm stats make the most sense, and just looking at them IMO is perfectly accurate. Paladins are the best healers in arena, everyone knows it.
Hunters are BS, everyone knows it.
Rogue/Lock/DK/Sham/Mage are all decent and can play in a decent number of comps. Priests aren't the best healers, and everyone knows druids/warriors are gimp right now, especially druid healers. I have a feeling almost every druid on there is a feral.
